Publié il y a 19 jours
Senior Software Engineer, AI Training - Canada
@ G2i Inc.
Toronto, ON · Calgary, AB · Mississauga, ON · Vancouver, BC · Montréal, QC +3
En bref
G2i Inc. is hiring a senior software engineer on a contract basis to evaluate how modern AI coding agents such as Codex and Claude Code behave in real scenarios. The work is remote and worldwide, pays $100-$200 per hour depending on experience and location, and runs 10-20 hours per week on ongoing projects. The role centres on judging the quality of reasoning and interaction rather than writing production code.
Salaire :
100 $–200 $ de l’heure
Responsabilités :
- Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end
- Judge usefulness and engineering judgment of agent outputs
- Assess quality of explanations and reasoning
- Give written, opinionated feedback on response quality
Résumé des exigences :
- Senior, Staff or Principal engineering experience
- Strong TypeScript, JavaScript or Python skills
- Hands-on experience with Codex, Claude Code or Cursor
- Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above)
Outils et compétences
Source et dates
Site carrière / système de candidatures · ashby
- Date publiée par l’employeur
- 2026-10-22
- Première détection par notre source
- 2026-10-08
- Mise à jour du dossier source
- 2026-11-04
Ces dates décrivent le dossier source, pas une vérification en direct du recrutement. Consultez l’offre originale.
Détails du poste
| Niveau | Senior |
| Domaine | Développement logiciel |
| Heures par semaine | 15 |
| Déplacements | avion : aucun · route : aucun |
| Milieu de travail | Domicile |
| Position | Surtout assis |
| Exigences physiques | physique faible · ordinateur élevé |
| Langues | English |
Résumé et détails rédigés par l’IA à partir de l’offre; l’offre de l’employeur fait foi.
G2i Inc.
| Champ | Valeur |
|---|---|
| Offres sur Jobsy | 3 |
Contract | Remote, worldwide | $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location | 10-20 hrs/week
Please note that eligibility may vary depending on your location, as some regions may not be supported by the client.
Check out this Loom video for more details: https://www.loom.com/share/b0d1b0bf24c44ae8b95dca84b9db60e5
We're looking for highly experienced software engineer (SR+) to help evaluate the quality of interactions with modern coding agents such as OpenAI Codex and Claude Code.
This is not a traditional engineering role. You won't be writing production code. You'll be evaluating something harder: whether the model thinks like a great engineer.
What this role actually is
You will assess how AI coding agents behave in real-world scenarios, focusing on:
• Whether the response makes sense
• Whether the preamble and reasoning are useful
• Whether the output reflects strong engineering judgment
• Whether the interaction feels right to an experienced developer
This role is about engineering taste. Syntax correctness is the easy part.
What you'll be doing
• Evaluate AI-generated coding interactions end to end
• Judge whether outputs are useful, correct at a high level, and aligned with how a strong engineer would think
• Assess the quality of explanations and reasoning, not just the code
• Distinguish between levels of response quality (what makes something a 2 vs a 4)
• Give clear, opinionated feedback in writing on what worked, what didn't, and what felt off or misleading
• Help define what great looks like when working with tools like Cursor, Codex and Claude Code
What we mean by "taste"
We're looking for engineers who can answer questions like:
• Does this feel like something a strong engineer would actually say?
• Is this explanation helpful, or just technically correct?
• Is the model guiding the user well, or just dumping output?
• Would this interaction build or erode trust?
You should be comfortable making subjective but rigorous judgments, and explaining them clearly.
Who you are
• Senior, Staff or Principal-level engineer (or equivalent experience)
• Strong background in TypeScript/JavaScript or Python
• Hands-on experience with at least one of OpenAI Codex, Claude Code or Cursor
• Deep familiarity with modern AI-assisted dev workflows
• Able to evaluate code without executing it or reviewing every line
• Strong written and spoken English (B2 or above). You'll be writing detailed feedback and recording short video explanations, so this is a hard requirement
• Comfortable giving direct, opinionated feedback
• High bar for what good engineering looks like
Nice to have
• Prior exposure to prompt design or evaluation workflows
• Experience mentoring senior engineers or defining engineering standards
Engagement details
• Rate: $100-$200/hour depending on experience and location
• Hours: 10-20 hours/week, flexible
• Duration: ongoing. Projects run from about two weeks to a few months each, and we offer new ones to evaluators who do well
• Start: as soon as you clear the take-home and a project has an open seat
• Process: one take-home evaluation exercise with a recorded Loom walkthrough. No interview
Journal
Visible seulement par vous. Conservé sur cet appareil, et dans votre compte une fois connecté.